Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Comparing Cost of Revenue: Cummins vs. Booz Allen

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationCummins Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014271611300014360000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015259384900014163000000
Friday, January 1, 2016258002600013057000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017269198200015338000000
Monday, January 1, 2018286710300018034000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019310046600017591000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020337918000014917000000
Friday, January 1, 2021365753000018326000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022389962200021355000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023430481000025816000000
Monday, January 1, 2024820284700025663000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue Trends: Cummins Inc. vs. Booz Allen Hamilton

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency and profitability. Over the past decade, Cummins Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue increased by approximately 59%, reflecting a strategic expansion in its operations. In contrast, Cummins Inc. experienced a more modest growth of around 80% during the same period, indicating a steady scaling of its manufacturing capabilities.

Interestingly, 2024 data for Cummins Inc. is missing, which could suggest a reporting delay or strategic shift. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in managing their operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike. As the business world continues to adapt, monitoring these trends will be essential for predicting future performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025