__timestamp | Cummins Inc. | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 14360000000 | 10621373000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14163000000 | 10146494000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 13057000000 | 9196326000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15338000000 | 8250536000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 18034000000 | 12156276000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 17591000000 | 10260840000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 14917000000 | 10980307000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18326000000 | 11048860000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 21355000000 | 11595785000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 25816000000 | 12879099000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 25663000000 | 8668185000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have showcased intriguing cost of revenue trends over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Cummins Inc. experienced a remarkable 80% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking in 2023. This growth reflects the company's expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. displayed a more stable trajectory, with a modest 21% rise over the same period, indicating a consistent approach to managing production costs.
The data reveals a fascinating divergence in strategies between these two industry leaders. While Cummins Inc. aggressively scaled its operations, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. maintained a steady course. This comparison offers valuable insights into how different business models adapt to market demands and economic conditions. As we look to the future, these trends may provide a glimpse into the evolving dynamics of the industrial sector.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and AerCap Holdings N.V.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation
Annual Revenue Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Cummins Inc. vs Pentair plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Cummins Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Gross Profit Comparison: Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Trends
Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance