__timestamp | Evotec SE | HUTCHMED (China) Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 60118000 | 72049000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 89690000 | 110777000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 105953000 | 156328000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 175062000 | 175820000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 263389000 | 143944000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 313546000 | 160152000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 375181000 | 188519000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 466491000 | 258234000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 577383000 | 311103000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 606375000 | 384447000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, Evotec SE and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have shown distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. Evotec SE's cost of revenue surged by approximately 900%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and scaling strategies. In contrast, HUTCHMED (China) Limited experienced a more moderate increase of around 430%, indicating a steady growth approach.
These trends underscore the dynamic nature of cost management in the biotech industry, offering valuable insights for investors and stakeholders.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Evotec SE
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Zoetis Inc. and Evotec SE
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Lantheus Holdings, Inc. vs Evotec SE: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Trends: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
R&D Spending Showdown: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Evotec SE
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. and Evotec SE
Galapagos NV vs Evotec SE: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Evotec SE: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Evotec SE and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.