Cost of Revenue Trends: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Biopharma Cost Trends: ADMA vs. HUTCHMED

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014374236772049000
Thursday, January 1, 20154311461110777000
Friday, January 1, 20166360761156328000
Sunday, January 1, 201729164321175820000
Monday, January 1, 201842194635143944000
Tuesday, January 1, 201939504238160152000
Wednesday, January 1, 202061291426188519000
Friday, January 1, 202179769341258234000
Saturday, January 1, 2022118814535311103000
Sunday, January 1, 2023169273000384447000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for ADMA Biologics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, ADMA Biologics saw a staggering 4,400% increase in its cost of revenue, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expansion efforts. In contrast, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue rose by 434%, indicating a more stable yet significant growth trajectory.

Key Insights

  • ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Starting at a modest $3.7 million in 2014, the company's cost of revenue surged to $169 million by 2023, highlighting its rapid scaling and increased production capabilities.
  • HUTCHMED (China) Limited: With a starting point of $72 million in 2014, the company reached $384 million in 2023, showcasing its steady expansion in the competitive Chinese market.

These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by biopharma companies in navigating market demands and operational challenges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025