Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Johnson & Johnson and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Comparing Cost of Revenue: J&J vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015189600021536000000
Friday, January 1, 2016269900021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017170200025354000000
Monday, January 1, 201847100027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600028427000000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022659400024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023466100026553000000
Monday, January 1, 202427471000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Johnson & Johnson, a titan in the sector, consistently reported a cost of revenue exceeding $21 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their expansive operations and robust market presence. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a smaller player, showed a more volatile trend, with costs ranging from $122,000 in 2014 to a peak of $7.3 million in 2021. This disparity highlights the scale and operational differences between the two companies. Over the decade, Johnson & Johnson's cost of revenue grew by approximately 17%, while BioCryst's fluctuated significantly, indicating strategic shifts and market challenges. These insights underscore the diverse strategies and market positions within the pharmaceutical industry, offering a window into the financial dynamics that drive these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025