Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Cost Efficiency Showdown: J&J vs Gilead Sciences

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014378800000022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015400600000021536000000
Friday, January 1, 2016426100000021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017437100000025354000000
Monday, January 1, 2018485300000027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019467500000027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020457200000028427000000
Friday, January 1, 2021660100000023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022565700000024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023649800000026553000000
Monday, January 1, 20242867580000027471000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for sustained growth and competitiveness. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson and Gilead Sciences, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in managing their cost of revenue.

Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the healthcare sector, consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, averaging around $24.9 billion annually. This reflects their expansive product portfolio and global reach. Notably, their cost efficiency peaked in 2020, with a 32% increase from 2014.

Conversely, Gilead Sciences, Inc., known for its innovative treatments, demonstrated a more dynamic cost structure. Their cost of revenue surged by approximately 72% over the same period, highlighting strategic investments in research and development.

This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by these industry giants in navigating financial efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025