__timestamp | ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. | HUTCHMED (China) Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 60602000 | 72049000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 76369000 | 110777000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 4406000 | 156328000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 13060000 | 175820000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 18330000 | 143944000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19598000 | 160152000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 20550000 | 188519000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 19141000 | 258234000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 10166000 | 311103000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 45731000 | 384447000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the cost of revenue trends for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue surged by over 400%, peaking in 2023, while ACADIA experienced a more modest increase of around 25%.
HUTCHMED's costs consistently outpaced ACADIA's, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies in China and beyond. In contrast, ACADIA's cost fluctuations suggest a more conservative approach, possibly focusing on niche markets or cost management. Notably, 2023 marked a significant spike for both companies, hinting at industry-wide challenges or opportunities.
For investors and industry watchers, these trends underscore the importance of strategic positioning and market focus in the biopharma sector. As these companies navigate the complexities of global healthcare, their cost management strategies will be pivotal in shaping their future trajectories.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
BeiGene, Ltd. vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Insmed Incorporated vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Exelixis, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Pharming Group N.V. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Alkermes plc and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Veracyte, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Galapagos NV: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Trends: Vericel Corporation vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Geron Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.