Cost of Revenue Trends: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Comparing cost trends of Booz Allen and Jacobs Engineering.

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationJacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014271611300010621373000
Thursday, January 1, 2015259384900010146494000
Friday, January 1, 201625800260009196326000
Sunday, January 1, 201726919820008250536000
Monday, January 1, 2018286710300012156276000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019310046600010260840000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020337918000010980307000
Friday, January 1, 2021365753000011048860000
Saturday, January 1, 2022389962200011595785000
Sunday, January 1, 2023430481000012879099000
Monday, January 1, 202482028470008668185000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Comparative Analysis

Booz Allen Hamilton vs. Jacobs Engineering

In the ever-evolving landscape of engineering and consulting, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have been industry stalwarts, each with unique cost structures. From 2014 to 2024, Booz Allen Hamilton's cost of revenue has shown a steady increase, peaking at a remarkable 8.2 billion in 2024, a 202% rise from 2014. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering's cost of revenue, while consistently higher, has experienced fluctuations, with a notable peak in 2023 at 12.9 billion. This represents a 21% increase from 2014. These trends highlight Booz Allen's aggressive growth strategy, while Jacobs maintains a more stable yet fluctuating cost pattern. As the industry adapts to new challenges, these insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these two giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025