Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Trends: Booz Allen vs. Jacobs - A Decade in Review

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationJacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422296420001545716000
Thursday, January 1, 201521594390001522811000
Friday, January 1, 201623195920001429233000
Sunday, January 1, 201725685110001379983000
Monday, January 1, 201827199090002180399000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929326020002072177000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033343780002050695000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220002355683000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500002409190000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690002398078000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430002140320000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of SG&A Trends: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. Jacobs Engineering

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses serve as a critical indicator of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.

From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's SG&A costs surged by approximately 95%, peaking in 2023. This upward trend reflects the company's strategic investments in growth and innovation. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering experienced a more modest increase of around 55% over the same period, indicating a more conservative approach to managing operational costs.

Interestingly, 2024 marks a significant drop in Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses, suggesting a potential shift in strategy or operational restructuring. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025