Cost of Revenue Trends: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Pharma Giants' Cost Trends: A Decade of Change

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201439320000003788000000
Thursday, January 1, 201539090000004006000000
Friday, January 1, 201649460000004261000000
Sunday, January 1, 201760660000004371000000
Monday, January 1, 201865470000004853000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201980780000004675000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020117730000004572000000
Friday, January 1, 202199400000006601000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022101370000005657000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023106930000006498000000
Monday, January 1, 20241194900000028675800000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Gilead Sciences, Inc. have been at the forefront of this sector, each with unique cost trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's cost of revenue surged by approximately 172%, reflecting strategic investments and expansions. In contrast, Gilead Sciences experienced a more modest increase of around 72%, indicating a steady yet controlled growth approach. Notably, 2020 marked a significant year for Bristol-Myers Squibb, with costs peaking at over 11 billion, a 45% jump from the previous year. Meanwhile, Gilead Sciences saw its highest cost in 2021, reaching nearly 6.6 billion. These trends highlight the contrasting strategies of these pharmaceutical titans, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025