__timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Caterpillar Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 12401436000 | 40391000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 12259014000 | 34133000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 11931821000 | 28905000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 13680857000 | 31695000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 15269479000 | 37719000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14021726000 | 37384000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 15037716000 | 29671000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21493659000 | 35968000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 22826428000 | 41915000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 16457570000 | 43797000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 16416191000 | 41485000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial and logistics sectors, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, Caterpillar Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. have showcased distinct trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Caterpillar's cost of revenue has seen a steady increase, peaking in 2023 with a 51% rise from its 2016 low. This reflects Caterpillar's robust growth and strategic investments in heavy machinery and infrastructure. Conversely, C.H. Robinson experienced a more volatile trajectory, with a notable 91% surge from 2016 to 2022, before a 28% drop in 2023. This fluctuation highlights the challenges and opportunities in the logistics sector, influenced by global supply chain dynamics. These insights underscore the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage in their respective industries.
Caterpillar Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Caterpillar Inc. vs Clean Harbors, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Caterpillar Inc. vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Caterpillar Inc. or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Caterpillar Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance