Cost of Revenue Trends: Grifols, S.A. vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

Comparing cost trends of Grifols and Dyne Therapeutics from 2014-2023.

__timestampDyne Therapeutics, Inc.Grifols, S.A.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411450000001656170000
Thursday, January 1, 201520280000002003565000
Friday, January 1, 201622810000002137539000
Sunday, January 1, 201729320000002166062000
Monday, January 1, 2018240002437164000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192710002757459000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207000003084873000
Friday, January 1, 202110880002970522000
Saturday, January 1, 202233450003832437000
Sunday, January 1, 202324610004269276000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

Grifols, S.A. vs. Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Grifols, S.A., a global leader in plasma-derived medicines, has consistently demonstrated robust cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Grifols' cost of revenue surged by approximately 158%, peaking at over $4.2 billion in 2023. This steady growth reflects their strategic investments and market expansion.

Conversely, Dyne Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology firm focused on muscle diseases, presents a contrasting narrative. After a significant cost spike in 2017, reaching nearly $2.9 billion, Dyne's costs plummeted, stabilizing around $2.5 million by 2023. This dramatic shift underscores the volatility and challenges faced by emerging biotech companies.

These trends highlight the diverse financial strategies and market conditions impacting pharmaceutical giants and innovative biotech firms alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025