Cost of Revenue Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma Cost Trends: Amphastar vs. Neurocrine

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201415920500014400000
Thursday, January 1, 201517417200033800000
Friday, January 1, 201615097600035900000
Sunday, January 1, 20171493800001254000
Monday, January 1, 20181876810004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191904340007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020650600010100000
Friday, January 1, 202123802900014300000
Saturday, January 1, 202225012700023200000
Sunday, January 1, 202329327400039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the dynamic world of biopharmaceuticals, understanding cost trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. Over the past decade, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have shown contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Amphastar's cost of revenue surged by approximately 84%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. experienced a more modest growth of around 176% in the same period, indicating a strategic focus on niche markets and innovative therapies.

Key Insights

  • Amphastar Pharmaceuticals: Starting at 159 million in 2014, Amphastar's cost of revenue reached nearly 293 million by 2023, showcasing its robust growth strategy.
  • Neurocrine Biosciences: Despite a lower starting point of 14 million in 2014, Neurocrine's cost of revenue climbed to 39 million in 2023, highlighting its steady market penetration.

These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by these companies in navigating the competitive biopharma landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025