| __timestamp | Oracle Corporation | Pure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 7236000000 | 24129000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 7532000000 | 77552000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 7479000000 | 167893000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 7452000000 | 252279000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 8060000000 | 353781000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 7995000000 | 457528000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7938000000 | 509886000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7855000000 | 535255000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8877000000 | 708329000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 13564000000 | 855788000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 15143000000 | 809430000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Oracle Corporation, a stalwart in enterprise software, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 110% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc., a leader in data storage solutions, experienced a staggering 3,250% increase over the same period. This stark difference highlights the varying growth trajectories and operational scales of these two companies.
From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's cost of revenue consistently hovered around the $8 billion mark until a sharp rise in 2023, reaching over $15 billion in 2024. Meanwhile, Pure Storage's costs, starting at a modest $24 million in 2014, surged to over $800 million by 2024. This data underscores the rapid expansion and scaling challenges faced by newer tech firms compared to established giants.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.?
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Oracle Corporation vs PTC Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Oracle Corporation vs Western Digital Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Oracle Corporation vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Oracle Corporation vs ON Semiconductor Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Oracle Corporation and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Oracle Corporation and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Oracle Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Oracle Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Oracle Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.