__timestamp | Oracle Corporation | Pure Storage, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8605000000 | 60652000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8732000000 | 184674000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9039000000 | 315976000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 9299000000 | 444687000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9715000000 | 575200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 9774000000 | 721617000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9275000000 | 891175000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 8936000000 | 898491000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 9364000000 | 988982000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 10412000000 | 1121605000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 9822000000 | 1197264000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Oracle Corporation, a stalwart in enterprise software, and Pure Storage, Inc., a rising star in data storage solutions, present an intriguing comparison in cost optimization strategies over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2023 with a 21% rise from 2014. In contrast, Pure Storage, starting with significantly lower expenses, has seen a dramatic increase of over 1,800% in the same period, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion strategy.
While Oracle's expenses reflect its established market presence, Pure Storage's rising costs highlight its aggressive market penetration. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by tech companies in managing operational costs while scaling their businesses.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.?
Cost of Revenue Trends: Oracle Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Oracle Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Oracle Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Oracle Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or ON Semiconductor Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Oracle Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Oracle Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Oracle Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Oracle Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Oracle Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc.