Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.

Oracle vs. Pure Storage: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampOracle CorporationPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014860500000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 20158732000000184674000
Friday, January 1, 20169039000000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 20179299000000444687000
Monday, January 1, 20189715000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199774000000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209275000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 20218936000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 20229364000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 2023104120000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 202498220000001197264000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: Oracle vs. Pure Storage

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Oracle Corporation, a stalwart in enterprise software, and Pure Storage, Inc., a rising star in data storage solutions, present an intriguing comparison in cost optimization strategies over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking in 2023 with a 21% rise from 2014. In contrast, Pure Storage, starting with significantly lower expenses, has seen a dramatic increase of over 1,800% in the same period, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion strategy.

Strategic Insights

While Oracle's expenses reflect its established market presence, Pure Storage's rising costs highlight its aggressive market penetration. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by tech companies in managing operational costs while scaling their businesses.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025