Cytokinetics, Incorporated or Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biopharma SG&A Costs: Amphastar vs. Cytokinetics

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20144037300017268000
Thursday, January 1, 20154697400019667000
Friday, January 1, 20164729800027823000
Sunday, January 1, 20175091800036468000
Monday, January 1, 20185804400031282000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196310900039610000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206515700052820000
Friday, January 1, 20216892000096803000
Saturday, January 1, 202266592000177977000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000173612000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated, two prominent players in the industry, have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Amphastar's SG&A costs increased by approximately 99%, while Cytokinetics saw a staggering rise of over 900%. In 2014, Amphastar's expenses were more than double those of Cytokinetics, but by 2023, Cytokinetics had surpassed Amphastar, with expenses more than twice as high. This dramatic shift highlights Cytokinetics' aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, Amphastar's steady growth reflects a more conservative approach. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025