Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Cytokinetics, Incorporated

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Genmab vs. Cytokinetics

__timestampCytokinetics, IncorporatedGenmab A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 20141726800079529000
Thursday, January 1, 20151966700091224000
Friday, January 1, 201627823000102413000
Sunday, January 1, 201736468000146987000
Monday, January 1, 201831282000213695000
Tuesday, January 1, 201939610000342000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052820000661000000
Friday, January 1, 2021968030001283000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221779770002676000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231736120003297000000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Cytokinetics, Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately 80 million to 3.3 billion, reflecting a growth of over 4,000%. This surge indicates aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Cytokinetics, Incorporated has maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses growing from 17 million to 174 million, a tenfold increase. This suggests a focus on cost efficiency while scaling operations. As these companies continue to evolve, their strategies in managing SG&A costs will be pivotal in determining their competitive edge in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025