__timestamp | Deere & Company | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 3284400000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2873300000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2763700000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3066600000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3455500000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3551000000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3477000000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3383000000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3863000000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3601000000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 4507000000 | 2264000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the world of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry leaders can offer valuable insights. Deere & Company and Waste Management, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Deere & Company consistently outspent Waste Management, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $4.5 billion in 2024, marking a 37% increase from 2014. In contrast, Waste Management's SG&A expenses grew more modestly, reaching nearly $1.9 billion in 2022, a 31% rise from 2014. This divergence highlights Deere's aggressive investment in administrative capabilities, while Waste Management maintains a more conservative approach. Notably, data for Waste Management in 2024 is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends. These patterns reflect broader strategic priorities and market positioning, offering a window into the operational focus of these two industry titans.
Revenue Insights: Deere & Company and Waste Management, Inc. Performance Compared
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Deere & Company vs Waste Management, Inc.
Deere & Company and Waste Management, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Deere & Company Compared to Waste Management, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Deere & Company and Cintas Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Deere & Company vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation