EBITDA Performance Review: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs. ZTO: A Decade of Divergent Growth

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144289000000876815000
Thursday, January 1, 201531510000001687285000
Friday, January 1, 201629990000003093956000
Sunday, January 1, 201714959308914308801000
Monday, January 1, 201813456860085185941000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919134746756727397000
Wednesday, January 1, 202027570000005197064000
Friday, January 1, 202119942964415866901000
Saturday, January 1, 2022301000000011147519000
Sunday, January 1, 2023295000000013853443000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Thomson Reuters vs. ZTO Express

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the financial performance of companies is a key indicator of their strategic prowess. Over the past decade, Thomson Reuters Corporation and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories. From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters experienced a 31% decline in EBITDA, starting at a peak in 2014 and reaching a low in 2018. In contrast, ZTO Express demonstrated a robust growth of over 1,400% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive expansion in the logistics sector.

Key Insights

  • Thomson Reuters: Despite fluctuations, the company maintained a steady recovery post-2018, with a notable 122% increase by 2022.
  • ZTO Express: The company's EBITDA surged, particularly from 2018 onwards, highlighting its dominance in the Asian logistics market.

This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of global markets and the strategic shifts companies must undertake to thrive.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025