Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters vs. ZTO Express Over a Decade

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20149209000000534537000
Thursday, January 1, 20158810000000591738000
Friday, January 1, 20168232000000705995000
Sunday, January 1, 20178079000000780517000
Monday, January 1, 201841310000001210717000
Tuesday, January 1, 201944130000001546227000
Wednesday, January 1, 202039990000001663712000
Friday, January 1, 202116240000001875869000
Saturday, January 1, 202216220000002077372000
Sunday, January 1, 2023640000002425253000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Thomson Reuters Corporation and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters, a global leader in information services, saw a dramatic 99% decrease in SG&A expenses over the decade, dropping from a peak in 2014 to a mere fraction by 2023. This reduction reflects strategic cost-cutting measures and a shift in business focus.

Conversely, ZTO Express, a major player in China's express delivery industry, experienced a 354% increase in SG&A expenses, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy. By 2023, ZTO's expenses surpassed those of Thomson Reuters, indicating a significant investment in growth and market penetration.

This juxtaposition underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to navigate their respective industries.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025