Fastenal Company or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Fastenal vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampFastenal CompanyJacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411107760001545716000
Thursday, January 1, 201511215900001522811000
Friday, January 1, 201611694700001429233000
Sunday, January 1, 201712828000001379983000
Monday, January 1, 201814002000002180399000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914594000002072177000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014274000002050695000
Friday, January 1, 202115598000002355683000
Saturday, January 1, 202217622000002409190000
Sunday, January 1, 202318258000002398078000
Monday, January 1, 202418919000002140320000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Fastenal Company and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. have been navigating this financial landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Fastenal has demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing approximately 70% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. saw a more volatile trend, with a peak in 2022, followed by a decline in 2024.

Fastenal's consistent growth in SG&A expenses, averaging around 1.5 billion annually, reflects its strategic expansion and operational efficiency. Meanwhile, Jacobs Engineering's fluctuating expenses, peaking at 2.4 billion in 2022, suggest a more dynamic approach to cost management. As businesses strive for efficiency, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into corporate financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025