Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Fastenal Company or AerCap Holdings N.V.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Fastenal vs. AerCap

__timestampAerCap Holdings N.V.Fastenal Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20142999000001110776000
Thursday, January 1, 20153813080001121590000
Friday, January 1, 20163510120001169470000
Sunday, January 1, 20173482910001282800000
Monday, January 1, 20183052260001400200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192674580001459400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202421610001427400000
Friday, January 1, 20213178880001559800000
Saturday, January 1, 20223995300001762200000
Sunday, January 1, 20234641280001825800000
Monday, January 1, 20241891900000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost optimization strategies of Fastenal Company and AerCap Holdings N.V. over the past decade.

Fastenal Company: A Steady Climb

Fastenal Company has consistently increased its SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $1.11 billion in 2014 to nearly $1.83 billion in 2023. This represents a 65% increase over the period, reflecting the company's expansion and investment in operational capabilities.

AerCap Holdings N.V.: A Fluctuating Path

In contrast, AerCap Holdings N.V. has experienced more volatility. Starting at around $300 million in 2014, their SG&A expenses peaked at $464 million in 2023, marking a 55% increase. However, the path was not linear, with significant fluctuations observed.

Conclusion

While both companies have increased their SG&A expenses, Fastenal's steady growth suggests a more consistent strategy, whereas AerCap's fluctuations may indicate adaptive cost management in response to market conditions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025