Cost of Revenue Comparison: Fastenal Company vs Snap-on Incorporated

Fastenal vs Snap-on: A Decade of Revenue Cost Trends

__timestampFastenal CompanySnap-on Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050001693400000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530001704500000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590001720800000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000001862000000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000001870700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000001886000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000001844000000
Friday, January 1, 202132337000002141200000
Saturday, January 1, 202237648000002311700000
Sunday, January 1, 202339922000002488500000
Monday, January 1, 202441441000002329500000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of industrial supply, Fastenal Company and Snap-on Incorporated have carved distinct paths over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Fastenal's cost of revenue surged by approximately 126%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Snap-on's cost of revenue grew by about 47% during the same period, indicating a more measured approach.

Fastenal's cost of revenue consistently outpaced Snap-on's, with a notable spike in 2022, reaching nearly 60% higher than Snap-on's. This trend underscores Fastenal's robust supply chain and operational efficiency. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete for Snap-on, leaving room for speculation on its future trajectory.

As these industry giants continue to evolve, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into the dynamics of cost management and revenue generation in the industrial sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025