__timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Ferrovial SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5478693000 | 8802000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5274770000 | 9699000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 5405738000 | 10758000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 5804284000 | 12209000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 6171853000 | 5737000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 6704037000 | 6054000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 7463841000 | 6341000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7858938000 | 6778000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8363700000 | 7551000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 9258911000 | 8514000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 10661896000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, Ferrovial SE and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased remarkable revenue trajectories, reflecting their strategic prowess and market adaptability.
From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's revenue surged by approximately 95%, highlighting its robust growth strategy in the consulting sector. In contrast, Ferrovial SE, a leader in infrastructure, experienced a more fluctuating revenue pattern, with a notable dip in 2018. Despite this, Ferrovial's revenue in 2023 was still commendable, albeit slightly lower than Booz Allen's.
While Booz Allen's data extends into 2024, Ferrovial's figures for the same year remain elusive, leaving room for speculation on its future trajectory. This gap underscores the dynamic nature of financial forecasting and the importance of comprehensive data analysis.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Ferrovial SE or Snap-on Incorporated?
Who Generates More Revenue? Ferrovial SE or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Ferrovial SE or IDEX Corporation?
Ferrovial SE vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown