Genmab A/S or Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Genmab vs. Halozyme: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGenmab A/SHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147952900035942000
Thursday, January 1, 20159122400040028000
Friday, January 1, 201610241300045853000
Sunday, January 1, 201714698700053816000
Monday, January 1, 201821369500060804000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934200000077252000
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000045736000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000050323000
Saturday, January 1, 20222676000000143526000
Sunday, January 1, 20233297000000149182000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000154335000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Managing SG&A Costs: Genmab A/S vs. Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, rising from approximately $80 million to over $3.3 billion. This represents a growth of over 4,000%, reflecting the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A expenses, increasing from around $36 million to $149 million, a more modest 314% rise.

This data highlights Genmab's expansive strategy, while Halozyme's approach suggests a focus on cost containment. Investors and industry analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025