Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Merus N.V.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Gilead vs. Merus: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Merus N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201429830000003852327
Thursday, January 1, 20153426000000839656
Friday, January 1, 201633980000004478145
Sunday, January 1, 2017387800000016432324
Monday, January 1, 2018405600000011890871
Tuesday, January 1, 2019438100000034110000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020515100000035781000
Friday, January 1, 2021524600000040896000
Saturday, January 1, 2022567300000052200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023609000000059836000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Cost Management: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs. Merus N.V.

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Merus N.V. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Gilead Sciences has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $6.1 billion in 2023. This represents a 104% increase from 2014, reflecting their expansive operational scale and investment in administrative capabilities.

Merus N.V.

Conversely, Merus N.V. has managed to keep its SG&A expenses significantly lower, with a peak of around $59.8 million in 2023. This is a staggering 1,454% increase from 2015, showcasing their rapid growth and strategic cost management.

Conclusion

While Gilead's expenses are higher, their scale justifies it. Merus, with its leaner approach, highlights efficient cost management in a growing company.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025