Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Gilead vs. Neurocrine - A Decade of Growth

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014298300000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 2015342600000032480000
Friday, January 1, 2016339800000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 20173878000000169906000
Monday, January 1, 20184056000000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194381000000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205151000000433300000
Friday, January 1, 20215246000000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 20225673000000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 20236090000000887600000
Monday, January 1, 202460910000001007200000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: Gilead Sciences vs. Neurocrine Biosciences

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently outpaced Neurocrine Biosciences, with SG&A expenses growing from approximately $3 billion to over $6 billion, marking a 104% increase. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences started with a modest $18 million in 2014, escalating to nearly $888 million by 2023, a staggering 4,800% rise. This disparity highlights Gilead's established market presence and Neurocrine's aggressive growth strategy. As these companies navigate the competitive landscape, their financial decisions will continue to shape their trajectories and influence the broader industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025