__timestamp | Clean Harbors, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 959840000 | 1584300000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 918331000 | 1648300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 822369000 | 1709600000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 882305000 | 1824900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 994752000 | 1870000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1024371000 | 1844000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1006346000 | 1748500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1195729000 | 2110800000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1622675000 | 2181100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1663028000 | 2619800000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1824239000 | 2377900000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, Snap-on Incorporated and Clean Harbors, Inc. have emerged as significant players. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have shown distinct trajectories in their gross profit margins. Snap-on, a leader in manufacturing tools and equipment, has consistently outperformed Clean Harbors, a prominent environmental services provider.
These trends highlight the dynamic nature of these industries and the strategic maneuvers that have propelled these companies forward.
Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc.
Snap-on Incorporated and Saia, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Snap-on Incorporated vs U-Haul Holding Company
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Snap-on Incorporated vs Pool Corporation
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Snap-on Incorporated vs Elbit Systems Ltd.
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Snap-on Incorporated and Nordson Corporation: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc. Trends and Insights
Snap-on Incorporated and Clean Harbors, Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance