Insmed Incorporated or Mesoblast Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampInsmed IncorporatedMesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20143107300054170000
Thursday, January 1, 20154321600065378000
Friday, January 1, 20165067900052263000
Sunday, January 1, 20177917100035072000
Monday, January 1, 201816821800027415000
Tuesday, January 1, 201921079600036983000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020361300050918000
Friday, January 1, 202123427300063586000
Saturday, January 1, 202226578400057967000
Sunday, January 1, 202334450100053107000
Monday, January 1, 202423626000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Insmed Incorporated and Mesoblast Limited, two prominent players, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Insmed's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,000%, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Mesoblast maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses fluctuating modestly, peaking in 2015 and then stabilizing. By 2023, Mesoblast's SG&A costs were approximately 85% lower than Insmed's, highlighting their disciplined cost management. However, missing data for 2024 suggests caution in drawing definitive conclusions. This analysis underscores the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost control, offering valuable insights for investors and industry watchers alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025