Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Insmed Incorporated

AstraZeneca vs. Insmed: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCInsmed Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000031073000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000043216000
Friday, January 1, 2016973900000050679000
Sunday, January 1, 20171054300000079171000
Monday, January 1, 201810362000000168218000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911848000000210796000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011693000000203613000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000234273000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000265784000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000344501000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: AstraZeneca vs. Insmed

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AstraZeneca PLC and Insmed Incorporated, two prominent players, showcase contrasting strategies over the past decade.

AstraZeneca's Strategic Efficiency

From 2014 to 2023, AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 42% increase from 2016. This reflects strategic investments in marketing and administration, aligning with their global expansion efforts. Despite high absolute costs, AstraZeneca's scale allows for a more efficient cost-to-revenue ratio.

Insmed's Growth Trajectory

Conversely, Insmed's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,000% from 2014 to 2023, indicating aggressive growth and market penetration strategies. While their expenses are a fraction of AstraZeneca's, the rapid increase suggests a focus on scaling operations and expanding their market footprint.

Conclusion

Both companies exhibit distinct approaches to SG&A optimization, reflecting their unique market positions and growth strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025