__timestamp | CRISPR Therapeutics AG | Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5114000 | 10337679 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 13403000 | 18187286 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 31056000 | 24758063 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 35845000 | 23666957 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 48294000 | 30099855 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 63488000 | 64947625 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 88208000 | 186363444 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 102802000 | 272611040 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 102464000 | 358782000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 76162000 | 409864000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 72977000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, two pioneers in the field, have shown contrasting approaches over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. saw a staggering 3,865% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at $410 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics AG maintained a more conservative growth, with a 1,389% increase, reaching $76 million in 2023.
While Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. has invested heavily in scaling operations, CRISPR Therapeutics AG's strategy appears more focused on cost efficiency. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth with financial prudence, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of GSK plc and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Ascendis Pharma A/S
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and TG Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Verona Pharma plc
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Xencor, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Alkermes plc and CRISPR Therapeutics AG: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of CRISPR Therapeutics AG and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.