Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. or Grifols, S.A.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Grifols vs. Intra-Cellular Therapies

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200010337679
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500018187286
Friday, January 1, 201677526600024758063
Sunday, January 1, 201786034800023666957
Monday, January 1, 201881477500030099855
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100064947625
Wednesday, January 1, 2020985616000186363444
Friday, January 1, 20211061508000272611040
Saturday, January 1, 20221190423000358782000
Sunday, January 1, 20231254234000409864000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. or Grifols, S.A.?

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Grifols, S.A. has consistently outpaced Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. in terms of SG&A expenditure, with Grifols' costs increasing by approximately 90% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. saw a staggering increase of nearly 3,900% in the same period.

While Grifols' SG&A expenses grew steadily, reflecting its expansive operations, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.'s sharp rise indicates aggressive scaling and investment in growth. By 2023, Grifols' SG&A expenses were nearly three times higher than those of Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., highlighting its larger market footprint. This data provides a fascinating insight into how these companies allocate resources and manage operational costs, offering a glimpse into their strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025