__timestamp | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 207652000 | 1545716000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 228965000 | 1522811000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 243201000 | 1429233000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 266586000 | 1379983000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 296986000 | 2180399000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 340005000 | 2072177000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 357777000 | 2050695000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 376309000 | 2355683000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 489344000 | 2409190000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 536188999 | 2398078000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2140320000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of engineering and construction, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
From 2014 to 2023, Jacobs Engineering's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking in 2022 with a 56% increase from 2014. This reflects their expansive growth and strategic investments. In contrast, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has seen a more dramatic rise, with a 158% increase over the same period, indicating aggressive expansion and operational scaling.
Interestingly, 2024 data for Comfort Systems is missing, leaving room for speculation on their future financial strategies. These trends highlight the dynamic nature of the industry and the importance of strategic financial management.
Revenue Showdown: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. or CNH Industrial N.V.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. vs Elbit Systems Ltd.: SG&A Expense Trends
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance