Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. or CNH Industrial N.V.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Jacobs vs. CNH

__timestampCNH Industrial N.V.Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201429250000001545716000
Thursday, January 1, 201523170000001522811000
Friday, January 1, 201622620000001429233000
Sunday, January 1, 201723300000001379983000
Monday, January 1, 201823510000002180399000
Tuesday, January 1, 201922160000002072177000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021550000002050695000
Friday, January 1, 202124430000002355683000
Saturday, January 1, 202217520000002409190000
Sunday, January 1, 202318630000002398078000
Monday, January 1, 20242140320000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and CNH Industrial N.V. have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, CNH Industrial N.V. saw a significant reduction in SG&A expenses, dropping from 2.9 billion to 1.9 billion, a decrease of approximately 36%. Meanwhile, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. experienced a 55% increase, with expenses rising from 1.5 billion to 2.4 billion. This divergence highlights CNH's focus on cost efficiency, while Jacobs appears to be investing in growth. Notably, 2022 marked a pivotal year where Jacobs surpassed CNH in SG&A expenses, indicating a strategic shift. As we look to 2024, Jacobs' data remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on their future trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025