__timestamp | Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | Pentair plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1545716000 | 1493800000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1522811000 | 1334300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1429233000 | 979300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1379983000 | 1032500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2180399000 | 534300000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2072177000 | 540100000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2050695000 | 520500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2355683000 | 596400000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2409190000 | 677100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2398078000 | 680200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2140320000 | 701400000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the trends in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for investors and analysts alike. Over the past decade, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Pentair plc have showcased contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenses.
From 2014 to 2023, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. experienced a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a 75% rise from their 2014 levels. This upward trend reflects the company's strategic investments in growth and expansion.
Conversely, Pentair plc's SG&A expenses have seen a more volatile pattern, with a notable decline of over 60% from 2014 to 2018, followed by a gradual recovery. This fluctuation highlights the company's efforts in cost optimization and restructuring.
As we look to the future, the absence of 2024 data for Pentair plc leaves room for speculation on their strategic direction.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Pentair plc: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. vs Pentair plc
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and RB Global, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and IDEX Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. or XPO Logistics, Inc.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Avery Dennison Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared