Johnson & Johnson or ImmunityBio, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of industry giants and innovators.

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600021203000000
Friday, January 1, 20169439100019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100021420000000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207131800022084000000
Friday, January 1, 202113525600020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the industry, has consistently managed its SG&A costs, averaging around $21 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, ImmunityBio, Inc., a burgeoning biotech firm, has seen its SG&A expenses grow from approximately $4 million in 2014 to over $129 million in 2023, reflecting its rapid expansion and investment in growth.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson's SG&A expenses have shown remarkable stability, with fluctuations of less than 10% year-over-year. This consistency underscores their strategic financial management. Meanwhile, ImmunityBio's expenses have surged by over 2,800%, highlighting their aggressive growth strategy. This comparison offers a fascinating insight into how established giants and emerging innovators navigate financial management in the healthcare industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025