Johnson & Johnson vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Pharma Giants vs. New Entrants

__timestampDyne Therapeutics, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014114500000022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015202800000021536000000
Friday, January 1, 2016228100000021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017293200000025354000000
Monday, January 1, 20182400027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201927100027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202070000028427000000
Friday, January 1, 2021108800023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022334500024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023246100026553000000
Monday, January 1, 202427471000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs. Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two industry players: Johnson & Johnson and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the sector, consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $28.4 billion in 2020. Despite fluctuations, their cost efficiency reflects a stable growth trajectory, with a 23% increase over the decade. In contrast, Dyne Therapeutics, Inc., a relatively new entrant, exhibited a more volatile pattern. Their cost of revenue surged by over 150% from 2014 to 2017, followed by a significant drop in 2018, indicating strategic shifts or operational challenges.

This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by established giants and emerging innovators in managing their cost structures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025