__timestamp | Grifols, S.A. | Johnson & Johnson |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1656170000 | 22746000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2003565000 | 21536000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2137539000 | 21685000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2166062000 | 25354000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2437164000 | 27091000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2757459000 | 27556000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3084873000 | 28427000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2970522000 | 23402000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3832437000 | 24596000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4269276000 | 26553000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 27471000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and Grifols, S.A. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $26.6 billion in 2023. In contrast, Grifols, S.A. showed a significant upward trend, with a 158% increase from $1.7 billion in 2014 to $4.3 billion in 2023.
This divergence highlights the scale and operational strategies of these giants. While Johnson & Johnson's vast portfolio demands substantial revenue costs, Grifols' growth trajectory suggests aggressive expansion and investment. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into their market strategies and financial health, providing a window into the broader pharmaceutical landscape.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Johnson & Johnson vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson vs Viatris Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Johnson & Johnson and Grifols, S.A.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Johnson & Johnson and Cytokinetics, Incorporated's Expenses
Johnson & Johnson vs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Johnson & Johnson and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson vs Galapagos NV: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: GSK plc and Grifols, S.A.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Grifols, S.A.'s Expenses
Cost of Revenue Trends: Grifols, S.A. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Grifols, S.A. vs Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.