Johnson & Johnson vs Grifols, S.A.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: J&J vs. Grifols Over a Decade

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014165617000022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015200356500021536000000
Friday, January 1, 2016213753900021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017216606200025354000000
Monday, January 1, 2018243716400027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019275745900027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020308487300028427000000
Friday, January 1, 2021297052200023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022383243700024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023426927600026553000000
Monday, January 1, 202427471000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs. Grifols, S.A.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson and Grifols, S.A. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Johnson & Johnson consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $26.6 billion in 2023. In contrast, Grifols, S.A. showed a significant upward trend, with a 158% increase from $1.7 billion in 2014 to $4.3 billion in 2023.

This divergence highlights the scale and operational strategies of these giants. While Johnson & Johnson's vast portfolio demands substantial revenue costs, Grifols' growth trajectory suggests aggressive expansion and investment. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into their market strategies and financial health, providing a window into the broader pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025