Johnson & Johnson vs Merck & Co., Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency Showdown: J&J vs. Merck Over a Decade

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonMerck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142274600000016768000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152153600000014934000000
Friday, January 1, 20162168500000013891000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172535400000012775000000
Monday, January 1, 20182709100000013509000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192755600000014112000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202842700000013618000000
Friday, January 1, 20212340200000013626000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222459600000017411000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232655300000016126000000
Monday, January 1, 202427471000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Unveiling Cost Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs. Merck & Co., Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two industry giants, Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., Inc., from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Johnson & Johnson consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $28.4 billion in 2020. In contrast, Merck & Co., Inc. demonstrated a more conservative approach, with costs peaking at around $17.4 billion in 2022.

Interestingly, Johnson & Johnson's cost of revenue increased by about 17% from 2014 to 2023, while Merck's costs saw a modest rise of approximately 4%. This disparity highlights Johnson & Johnson's aggressive expansion strategies compared to Merck's more stable cost management. As the pharmaceutical landscape continues to shift, these insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025