Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Merck & Co., Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Merck vs. Neurocrine: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampMerck & Co., Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141676800000014400000
Thursday, January 1, 20151493400000033800000
Friday, January 1, 20161389100000035900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017127750000001254000
Monday, January 1, 2018135090000004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019141120000007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201361800000010100000
Friday, January 1, 20211362600000014300000
Saturday, January 1, 20221741100000023200000
Sunday, January 1, 20231612600000039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Merck & Co., Inc. vs. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's cost of revenue fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 19% increase from its lowest point in 2017. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences experienced a dramatic rise, with its cost of revenue surging by over 2,700% from 2017 to 2023. This stark difference highlights the diverse strategies and market conditions faced by these companies. While Merck's cost control reflects its established market presence, Neurocrine's increase suggests aggressive expansion and investment in new ventures. These insights provide a window into the strategic decisions shaping the future of these pharmaceutical giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025