Merck & Co., Inc. or Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Merck vs. Alpine: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014228770911606000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015684400010313000000
Friday, January 1, 201685860009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 201760790009830000000
Monday, January 1, 2018836200010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019946700010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020108990008955000000
Friday, January 1, 2021145600009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221796800010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232222200010504000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Merck & Co., Inc., a pharmaceutical giant, and Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc., a burgeoning biotech firm, present a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Merck's SG&A expenses have shown a slight decline, averaging around $10 billion annually, with a notable dip to $8.96 billion in 2020. In contrast, Alpine's SG&A costs have surged by nearly 872% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. While Merck's expenses are substantial, they represent a smaller percentage of its overall revenue compared to Alpine. This data highlights the different strategic approaches: Merck's focus on efficiency versus Alpine's investment in expansion. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into how companies navigate financial management in their respective growth phases.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025