Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampAlpine Immune Sciences, Inc.CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201422877098185000
Thursday, January 1, 201568440008871000
Friday, January 1, 201685860009645000
Sunday, January 1, 2017607900012387000
Monday, January 1, 2018836200014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019946700019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201089900017425000
Friday, January 1, 20211456000023040000
Saturday, January 1, 20221796800025116000
Sunday, January 1, 20232222200051953000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have been navigating this landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, CymaBay has consistently outpaced Alpine in SG&A spending, peaking at a staggering 52 million in 2023, more than double Alpine's 22 million. This trend suggests CymaBay's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, possibly reflecting a strategy focused on rapid growth and market penetration. In contrast, Alpine's more conservative approach, with a 10-year average SG&A of around 11 million, indicates a focus on cost efficiency. As both companies continue to innovate, their differing strategies in managing SG&A expenses will be pivotal in shaping their financial futures and competitive positions in the biotech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025