Merck & Co., Inc. or ImmunityBio, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Merck vs. ImmunityBio

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600010313000000
Friday, January 1, 2016943910009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017538210009830000000
Monday, January 1, 20183546300010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020713180008955000000
Friday, January 1, 20211352560009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000010504000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken different paths in managing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $10 billion annually. This consistency reflects Merck's robust cost management strategies, allowing it to focus on innovation and market expansion. In contrast, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses have shown significant volatility, with a peak in 2015 and a gradual increase towards 2023. Despite this, ImmunityBio's expenses are a fraction of Merck's, highlighting its leaner operational model.

This comparison underscores the diverse strategies in the pharmaceutical industry, where giants like Merck prioritize stability, while emerging players like ImmunityBio focus on agility and growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025