Merck & Co., Inc. or Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Merck vs. Walgreens

__timestampMerck & Co., Inc.Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141160600000017992000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151031300000022400000000
Friday, January 1, 2016976200000023910000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017983000000023813000000
Monday, January 1, 20181010200000024694000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191061500000023557000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020895500000025436000000
Friday, January 1, 2021963400000024586000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221004200000027295000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231050400000034205000000
Monday, January 1, 202428113000000
ngram

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Cost Management in the Pharmaceutical and Retail Sectors

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Merck & Co., Inc., a pharmaceutical titan, and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., a retail pharmacy leader, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses fluctuated modestly, peaking in 2014 and 2019, but generally maintaining a steady course around $10 billion. In contrast, Walgreens Boots Alliance consistently reported higher SG&A costs, averaging over $23 billion annually, with a notable increase of 43% from 2014 to 2023. This disparity highlights the distinct operational challenges faced by each industry. While Merck's expenses reflect the high stakes of pharmaceutical innovation, Walgreens' figures underscore the complexities of retail operations. As we look to 2024, Walgreens' data remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025