Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?

Neurocrine vs. CymaBay: Who Leads in Biotech Innovation?

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141582300046425000
Thursday, January 1, 20151702600081491000
Friday, January 1, 20161594100094291000
Sunday, January 1, 201718938000121827000
Monday, January 1, 201858124000160524000
Tuesday, January 1, 201983837000200000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035882000275000000
Friday, January 1, 202164542000328100000
Saturday, January 1, 202267995000463800000
Sunday, January 1, 202380118000565000000
Monday, January 1, 2024731100000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Investing in Innovation: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, innovation is the lifeblood of success. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have been at the forefront of this race, each investing heavily in research and development (R&D) over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Neurocrine Biosciences consistently outpaced CymaBay Therapeutics, with R&D expenses growing by an impressive 1,116%, reaching a peak in 2023. In contrast, CymaBay's R&D investment increased by 406% during the same period. This significant difference highlights Neurocrine's commitment to innovation, spending nearly four times more on R&D in 2023 compared to CymaBay. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these investments are crucial for developing groundbreaking therapies and maintaining a competitive edge. The data underscores the importance of strategic R&D spending in driving growth and innovation in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025