Research and Development Investment: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Biotech R&D: Gilead vs. Neurocrine's Decade of Investment

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014285400000046425000
Thursday, January 1, 2015301400000081491000
Friday, January 1, 2016509800000094291000
Sunday, January 1, 20173734000000121827000
Monday, January 1, 20185018000000160524000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199106000000200000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205039000000275000000
Friday, January 1, 20215363000000328100000
Saturday, January 1, 20224977000000463800000
Sunday, January 1, 20236923000000565000000
Monday, January 1, 20245907000000731100000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of Innovation: R&D Investments in Biotech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) investments are pivotal for innovation and growth. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting yet intriguing R&D investment strategies.

Gilead Sciences, a leader in antiviral drugs, has consistently invested heavily in R&D, with expenditures peaking in 2019 at nearly 9 billion USD. This represents a staggering 219% increase from 2014, underscoring their commitment to pioneering treatments. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, known for its focus on neurological and endocrine disorders, has shown a steady increase in R&D spending, culminating in a 2023 investment of approximately 565 million USD, a twelvefold rise since 2014.

These investment trends highlight the strategic priorities of each company, with Gilead's aggressive approach contrasting with Neurocrine's steady growth, reflecting their respective market positions and innovation goals.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025