Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending

Biotech Giants' R&D Spending: A Decade of Strategic Investments

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144642500094231000
Thursday, January 1, 201581491000146394000
Friday, January 1, 201694291000188272000
Sunday, January 1, 2017121827000166707000
Monday, January 1, 2018160524000401843000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019200000000560909000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020275000000722343000
Friday, January 1, 2021328100000771182000
Saturday, January 1, 2022463800000877090000
Sunday, January 1, 2023565000000877387000
Monday, January 1, 2024731100000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Strategic R&D Investments: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, research and development (R&D) spending is a critical indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their R&D investments. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta Therapeutics consistently outpaced Neurocrine Biosciences, with R&D expenses growing by approximately 830% compared to Neurocrine's 1,117% increase. By 2023, Sarepta's R&D spending reached nearly 880 million, while Neurocrine's was around 565 million. This strategic focus on R&D highlights the companies' dedication to advancing their therapeutic pipelines. As the biotech industry continues to evolve, these investments may prove pivotal in determining future market leaders. The data underscores the importance of sustained R&D efforts in driving innovation and maintaining a competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025