__timestamp | Novartis AG | Viking Therapeutics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 14993000000 | 1244910 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14247000000 | 5029636 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14192000000 | 4846776 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 14997000000 | 5329003 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16471000000 | 7121000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14369000000 | 9128000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 14197000000 | 10731000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 14886000000 | 10701000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 14253000000 | 16121000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 12489000000 | 37021000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 12566000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants and emerging players is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG, a global leader, consistently allocated substantial resources to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, averaging around $14.5 billion annually. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, Inc., a burgeoning biotech firm, demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory in SG&A spending, increasing from a modest $1.2 million in 2014 to an impressive $37 million by 2023.
This ten-year period highlights a strategic divergence: while Novartis maintained a steady investment, Viking's SG&A expenses surged by over 2,800%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration efforts. Such insights underscore the dynamic nature of financial planning in the pharmaceutical sector, where established firms and newcomers adopt distinct approaches to navigate competitive pressures and innovation demands.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
AstraZeneca PLC vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Novartis AG and Sanofi: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Novartis AG vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Amgen Inc. vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Catalent, Inc. vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Perrigo Company plc: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared