Novartis AG or Genmab A/S: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Novartis vs. Genmab

__timestampGenmab A/SNovartis AG
Wednesday, January 1, 20147952900014993000000
Thursday, January 1, 20159122400014247000000
Friday, January 1, 201610241300014192000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714698700014997000000
Monday, January 1, 201821369500016471000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934200000014369000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202066100000014197000000
Friday, January 1, 2021128300000014886000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022267600000014253000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023329700000012489000000
Monday, January 1, 202412566000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Novartis AG vs. Genmab A/S: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and Genmab A/S have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

A Comparative Analysis

From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $14.5 billion annually. In contrast, Genmab A/S, a smaller biotech firm, maintained a more modest average of approximately $889 million. Notably, Genmab's SG&A expenses surged by over 4,000% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion efforts. Meanwhile, Novartis AG's expenses showed a more stable trend, with a slight decrease of around 17% in 2023 compared to 2014.

Strategic Implications

This data highlights the strategic differences between a global pharmaceutical giant and a nimble biotech company, offering insights into their operational priorities and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025