Genmab A/S or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Genmab vs. Sarepta

__timestampGenmab A/SSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147952900049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20159122400075043000
Friday, January 1, 201610241300083749000
Sunday, January 1, 2017146987000122682000
Monday, January 1, 2018213695000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019342000000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020661000000317875000
Friday, January 1, 20211283000000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 20222676000000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 20233297000000481871000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Genmab A/S or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S's SG&A costs surged by over 4,000%, reaching a peak in 2023. This dramatic increase reflects the company's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest increase of approximately 900% over the same period.

While Genmab's strategy might indicate a robust growth phase, Sarepta's steadier approach suggests a focus on cost control. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial health and strategic direction.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025